Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:42:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/122648: security/barnyard-sguil6, repocopy request Message-ID: <20080411034243.6111A34781C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> Resent-Message-ID: <200804110350.m3B3o5SQ074963@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 122648 >Category: ports >Synopsis: security/barnyard-sguil6, repocopy request >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Apr 11 03:50:04 UTC 2008 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Paul Schmehl >Release: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386 >Organization: University of Texas at Dallas >Environment: System: FreeBSD hostname.utdallas.edu 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #4: Mon Apr 7 15:22:19 CDT 2008 root@hostname.utdallas.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >Description: security/barnyard-sguil6, please repocopy this port to security/barnyard-sguil. I just committed the three ports that this port works with to version 0.7.0. Rather than repo to barnyard-sguil7 or leave it at barnyard-sguil6, which might confuse some users, I think it's better to repocopy it to barnyard-sguil. Accordingly, I have just committed the security/sguil-sensor port upgrade with a dependency to security/barnyard-sguil (rather than barnyard-sguil6) and have requested that the committers ensure that all three ports *and* the repocopy are committed at the same time. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080411034243.6111A34781C>