Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:04:31 +0200 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Applying NAT-T patch Message-ID: <20070531190431.GA1627@jayce.zen.inc> In-Reply-To: <20070531084559.T3053@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <053120070319.25073.465E3EB3000078F2000061F122007348309709090E999C@comcast.net> <20070531072304.GA28098@zen.inc> <864plth28d.fsf@srvbsdnanssv.interne.kisoft-services.com> <20070531083738.GA28806@zen.inc> <20070531084559.T3053@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:52:03AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: [....] > Maybe you could start addressing the things I posted last September? > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011807.html I just integrated the patch. To be able to identify future versions of the patchs, and to have a fastest availability, new versions of the patch will be stored at http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD and files names will include the date. > Also lately someone in my digital neighborhood had problems compiling > the patch for kernels with and without NAT-T support, for KAME and > fast_ipsec. Seems some #ifdef and #includes were not worked out > properly. I do not know which verion of the patch was used because > they, unfortunately, always had the same name and no versioning. I know we had such issues with early versions of the patch, afaik it compiles cleanly for both KAME and FAST_IPSEC, with and without NAT-T support. But if some people still have issues with recent versions of the patch, please tell me so ! Yvan. -- NETASQ http://www.netasq.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070531190431.GA1627>