From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 5 23:56:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B95337B40D for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 23:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wasley.bl.mmtr.or.jp (wasley.bl.mmtr.or.jp [210.228.173.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E8DE43F3F for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 23:56:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp) Received: (qmail 5655 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 15:55:59 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (61.213.0.21) by mx.bl.mmtr.or.jp with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 15:55:59 +0900 Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 15:55:48 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20030706.155548.15269418.rushani@bl.mmtr.or.jp> To: hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp From: Hideyuki KURASHINA In-Reply-To: <20030705.161316.115933587.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <20030705.161316.115933587.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.bl.mmtr.or.jp/~rushani/rushani.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A052 6F98 6146 6FE3 91E2 DA6B F2FA 2088 439A DC57 X-URL: http://www.bl.mmtr.or.jp/~rushani/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.54 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: split up articles/contributors/articles.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 06:56:02 -0000 >>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 16:13:16 +0900 (JST), Hiroki Sato said: > Hi, > > I would like to commit a patch ( http://people.freebsd.org/~hrs/contributors.diff.gz >), > which splits up articles/contributors/articles.sgml into several files. > Although most of the contributors' lists are language-neutral, > the translation teams have to merge changes of the original lists now. > This change allows them to include the split files for the localized > article.sgml and so should reduce their work. > > Comments? I agree your idea. :) -- rushani