From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 19 08:47:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA14338 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 08:47:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.pernet.net (mail.pernet.net [205.229.0.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA14319 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 08:46:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neal@pernet.net) Received: from dilbert.pernet.net (dilbert.pernet.net [205.229.0.46]) by mail.pernet.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP id KAA22647 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 1998 10:56:24 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <01d501bd24f9$ddd19b00$2e00e5cd@dilbert.pernet.net> From: "Neal Rigney" To: Subject: stack trace Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 10:47:01 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Is my instinct correct that frames 9-16 of this kernel stack are user proccesses that were running at death? #8 0xf017db33 in syscall (frame={tf_es = 39, tf_ds = 39, tf_edi = 1207504, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -272641888, tf_isp = -272629788, tf_ebx = 24347481, tf_edx = 104, tf_ecx = -272642038, tf_eax = 5, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 7, tf_eip = 269482113, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 659, tf_esp = -272642264, tf_ss = 39}) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:914 #9 0x100ff881 in ?? () #10 0x5142 in ?? () #11 0xd6eb in ?? () #12 0xf723 in ?? () #13 0xfdcb in ?? () #14 0x9f0b in ?? () #15 0xccfa in ?? () #16 0x1095 in ?? () -- Neal Rigney, PERnet Communications, (409)729-4638 neal@mail.pernet.net "I've seen better bandwidth between two gorillas with flash cards!"