From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 09:47:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6A4106564A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EA98FC18 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nujel-0006uV-S8 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:47:15 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:47:15 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:47:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:47:02 +0100 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <201003231108.45102.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100118 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Another tool for updating /etc -- lua||other script language bikeshed X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:47:18 -0000 On 03/25/10 09:51, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be nice to have a "blessed" (i.e. present-in-base) script >> language interpreter with a syntax that has evolved since the >> 1970-ies? (with a side-glance to C that *has* evolved since the K&R >> style). > ... >> As a possible alternative, or at least to learn about others' opinion >> on the subject, I'd like to suggest Lua (http://www.lua.org/). > > I think there are lots of good arguments for Lua in the base, but that > etcmerge is definitely not one of them :-). Of course! Maybe I should have worded it better - my post has nothing specifically to do with etcmerge. At most it could serve some future developer and/or project.