From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Sep 12 21:41:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from sanson.reyes.somos.net (freyes.static.inch.com [216.223.199.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53A537B422; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomasa (tomasa.reyes.somos.net [10.0.0.11]) by sanson.reyes.somos.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA32671; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:31:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from fran@reyes.somos.net) Message-Id: <200009130431.AAA32671@sanson.reyes.somos.net> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "billf@FreeBSD.ORG" , "Stan Osborne" Cc: "freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:01:03 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: advocacy/21238: poor performance; missed opportunities Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Stan Osborne wrote: >Ok take it that way. Go ahead and close the PR without ever >consulting the person who submitted it in the first place. I am very sad to report that I had a simmilar experience in terms of a PR in the not so distant past. It is as if there is a quota of how many PRs need to be handled or as if they want to keep the number of open PRs to a certain level. My PR was closed and I was basically told to write to the questions list and provide more info. I had written to the questions list prior to opening the PR. Moreover, I provided what info I thought was necessary/needed. I was not even given the opportunity to expand. This is the exact type of behavior that will totally discourage new users to use FreeBSD. I would almost rather not have PRs than to have this type of behaviour. francisco Moderator of the Corporate BSD list http://www.egroups.com/group/BSD_Corporate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message