From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 13:38:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E60E16A403 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@tel.fer.hr) Received: from xaqua.tel.fer.hr (xaqua.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BDB43C9E for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:37:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zec@tel.fer.hr) Received: by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 19AEC9B654; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:38:38 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on xaqua.tel.fer.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 Received: from localhost (zec1.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.78]) by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC84E9B64F; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:38:37 +0100 (CET) From: Marko Zec To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:38:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <2d8af7bc0612100520g5672bfebh32c7a08de2db81c3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2d8af7bc0612100520g5672bfebh32c7a08de2db81c3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612101438.33014.zec@tel.fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qoska kotfare Subject: Re: Multipath Routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:38:41 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 14:20, qoska kotfare wrote: > Can anybody give a status if we have any p4 or any effort on > supporting/importing this from KAME?! > > OpenBSD and lately NetBSD have imported these and i remeber a post > from ~2005 where andre@ and Marko(Virtual Stacks implementor on 4.X) > discussed how to implement something similar to these days, and they > where discussing to implement something similar like Cisco VRF. > Any effort going on this?! I'm working on virtualizing the network stack for -CURRENT in p4, but this project is focused primarily on virtualizing the existing networking state / code, not on introducing new features like multipath routing. Marko