From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 10:39:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E2216A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:39:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C10B43D45 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:39:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004110919:39:12:835647.17416.2981833648 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:39:12 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <41909E5F.7020300@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:39:27 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041017 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20041109103151.40F326147@hoppel.local> In-Reply-To: <20041109103151.40F326147@hoppel.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: YES-__TRSYS_LV__3 (SR:-1.53) (SRN:SPAMROBOT) ----------------- Subject: Re: standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:39:36 -0000 Björn König wrote: > Rob wrote: > > >>[...] >>both have >> >> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5 >> >>although the first one claims to download CURRENT. >> >>And, eh, why is the filename "standard-supfile" and >>why not the more obvious "current-supfile" ? > > > It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT. > That's the reason why it should not be renamed. > The standard-supfile contains the standard tag of your release > to keep it up to date. Maybe someone will change this sentence > in standard-supfile to 'This file contains all of the "CVSup > collections" that make up the FreeBSD-stable source tree.' soon. If so, then why do we have a standard-supfile and a stable-supfile doing the same thing? If both bring you -STABLE, one of the two seems to be redundant to me and having two sup files doing the same only causes confusion. R.