From owner-freebsd-security Sun Apr 28 23:17:48 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA24622 for security-outgoing; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA24617 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA01257; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199604290613.XAA01257@precipice.shockwave.com> To: Darren Reed cc: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua, firewalls@GreatCircle.COM, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q on using "netpipes" for firewall maintanance tasks In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:29:09 +1000." <199604290232.TAA13913@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 23:13:54 -0700 From: Paul Traina Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: Q on using "netpipes" for firewall maintanance tasks > Where am I wrong? > Not buying the cisco box. Is this just a blatant marketting plug or is there a reason behind this ? Who, me? I'm just a stockholder. :-)