Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 02:38:00 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@tpu.ru> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] ipfw packet tagging Message-ID: <4465A8F8.2020601@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <ops9hgqpmr4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net> References: <ops9fwnzbw17d6mn@nuclight.avtf.net> <44648E66.6010800@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20060512065327.B16302@xorpc.icir.org> <ops9f3lwis4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net> <20060512085631.A19484@xorpc.icir.org> <ops9hgqpmr4fjv08@nuclight.avtf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vadim Goncharov wrote: > 12.05.06 22:56 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >>> A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching >>> range of tags? For example: >>> >>> ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20 >> >> >> i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code >> for matching port ranges etc to implement it, performance should >> be reasonably good. > > > OK, Andrey made new version of patches available: > http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/ > > Manpage patch is integrated as well as new untag/tagged range > functionality, > based on existing port ranges matching code. Short test shown that it > works. I might suggest that the new 'tablearg' keyword be useable in a tag command allowing a table to contain entries that give different tags. (I don't think it is in 5 but it may be in 6.. (not sure)) would be cool however.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4465A8F8.2020601>