From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 18:48:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259C5505; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA8F25E3; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.17.213] (unknown [188.200.110.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA6D43552; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:48:34 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <521116E3.7030403@marino.st> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:48:03 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: svn commit: r324901 - head/biology/tinker References: <201308181138.r7IBcZdA083649@svn.freebsd.org> <5210C446.8080908@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5210C446.8080908@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, John Marino , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:48:49 -0000 On 8/18/2013 14:55, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/18/2013 6:38 AM, John Marino wrote: >> Author: marino >> Date: Sun Aug 18 11:38:34 2013 >> New Revision: 324901 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324901 >> >> Log: >> biology/tinker: Regenerate distinfo to unbreak fetch >> >> Apparently the distfile was rerolled. The sizes of the file are only a few >> bytes apart. Since the master site never changed, it's reasonable just to >> regenerate the distinfo and bump the PORTREVISION. >> > > *exactly* what changed is needed to be known before we update the > distinfo. Did you do a comparison between the two tarballs? As I mentioned in the commit message, I couldn't obtain the first version. I didn't have it in any cache. Perhaps only the submitter of the PR 180518 could have done this. However, after committing, I realized I could have compared 6.2.06 with the previous version 6.2.05 which I did have. In any case, the tarball is from the same master site and this port has been broken for more 30 days. Had the tarball been compromised, it very likely would have been caught in such a long time. So do we trust the site or not? John