From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 5 00:31:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA23844 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 00:31:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles140.castles.com [208.214.165.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA23822 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 00:31:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA00870; Mon, 5 Oct 1998 00:35:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199810050735.AAA00870@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Bruce Evans cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shouldn't 'make includes' install stand.h? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Oct 1998 15:54:42 +1000." <199810050554.PAA28570@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 00:35:21 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> I'm not trying to be combative here; this is not a religious issue to > >> me... The current behavior just seems to me to violate POLA. > > > >Only if you have misapprehensions about what 'make includes' does. It > >seems mostly to trip up people with such misapprehensions. > > `includes' is a private target in src/Makefile for installing [all] the > includes. It isn't, and has not been for years. It might be meant to, which is a different matter entirely. It's also broken by design (includes should live with the code they describe). -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message