Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 07:24:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279156] print/ghostscript10: Update to 10.03.1 Message-ID: <bug-279156-7788-aGn0ATLCK7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-279156-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-279156-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279156 Michael Osipov <michaelo@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michaelo@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Osipov <michaelo@FreeBSD.org> --- I have a few questions regarding the patch: * What is the benefit for --exclude to have an absolute path? Isn't that the path inside he TAR file? * Why --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions? Do other ports do this? What is the problem this solves for this port? * You should be able to remove 90cabe08422afdd16bac5dd9217602679d943045.pat= ch because it is upstream now, though one should double check the patched file. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-279156-7788-aGn0ATLCK7>