From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Feb 8 22:55:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9114624DD0B for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FSDs3Ls3z4PFb for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 72F9F24DD0A; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BDE24DD09 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FSDs2Sjgz4PFZ for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CCB724A36 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 018MtPr8045066 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 018MtP6q045065 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 22:55:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243030] news/husky*: Update ports to latest versions Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 22:55:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: osharoiko@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 22:55:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243030 --- Comment #17 from Oleg Sharoyko --- (In reply to Ruslan Suleimanov from comment #16) 20191207 is what the name of the distfile has: husky-all-1.9-source-20191207 2019-12-05 is the string hardcoded in some source files: # grep -r 2019-12 work/ work/husky-1.9.20191207/sqpack/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-06"; work/husky-1.9.20191207/hpt/h/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-05"; work/husky-1.9.20191207/fidoconf/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-05"; work/husky-1.9.20191207/htick/h/cvsdate.h:char cvs_date[]=3D"2019-12-05"; Perhaps snapshot of source tree for this version was taken a couple days be= fore release distfile was built. I don't think port should update this - it's wh= at authors put into the distfile.=20 If you had my previous patch applied then new version will indeed leave some files untouched. It should still apply clean to the head of the ports tree.= If this is not what concerned you please describe what a bit more detailed (ca= n do it in Russian if that's easier, I'm just trying to keep main discussion in English in case someone will follow along this bug later). I will probably make another version of the patch as I have found a nicer w= ay to handle one caveat. Regards, Oleg --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=