From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat May 14 19:16:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBD8B3BC6A for ; Sat, 14 May 2016 19:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0048A1DBF for ; Sat, 14 May 2016 19:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u4EJHewR081804 for ; Sat, 14 May 2016 12:17:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <3FB7B394F70C4284830025722F00896A@Rivendell> References: <3FB7B394F70C4284830025722F00896A@Rivendell> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: Is there a way to automatically edit port Makefile and plist after updates Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 12:17:47 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 19:16:26 -0000 On Sat, 14 May 2016 12:36:07 +0300 Reko Turja via freebsd-ports wrote > There is one port that has completely unneeded things in both Makefile > and plist. Is there a way to Automatically change those afterwards - I > guess usual method of patching isn't applicable? > > Of course doing a portsnap fetch update and sedding the unneeded stuff > out from a shellscript each night instead of just portsnap is always > an option if there's nothing more refined available. If I'm following you correctly; Wouldn't just filing a pr(1) (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/) against the port, with your proposed patch, do it? It would then get those (proposed) changes into the ports tree permanently, and neither you, nor anyone else would have to deal with that overhead anymore. :) > > -Reko > --Chris