From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 21 10:10:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8250316A420 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:10:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahacking@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD5E43D45 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:10:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahacking@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id p77so584135nfc for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:10:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Psxb2vJLd+QBSCcY1pG2L+zLh3jSQ/dVNCqc1stocmm6/WvaU+N8cq1xvB6kSXpFxnO0Rl/yn3mT8Am0UgipyS6zeGquyGnELkvObtsxoQNw9htG+04aVgGkQDjs6LfiqW2q9OKxb+UxwZ6sn9ebqNt1Nlgn4UK7X5rbrRHtwLE= Received: by 10.49.33.10 with SMTP id l10mr1455295nfj; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.60.14 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:10:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:10:31 +1000 From: "Andrew Hacking" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Jails in 6.0 and devfs woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:10:33 -0000 I am trying to setp a jail in RELENG_6, and cannot apply the jail ruleset (ruleset 4) to the jail devfs mount point. The system also hangs if I try to apply the rules individually. I raised PR/93423 for this issue. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D93423 for details I am wondering if anyone else has had any success securing their jails (ie removing device nodes such as those that provide raw access to disks) ?