Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:22:15 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Martin_Waschb=FCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bug in poudriere? Message-ID: <A19AA3E8-9E94-4300-8FE1-6B69773AABDF@waschbuesch.de> In-Reply-To: <56FEFB3E.2060905@FreeBSD.org> References: <C8C1748C-D567-467D-B9AD-D475B3E37606@waschbuesch.de> <56FEFB3E.2060905@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 02.04.2016 um 00:50 schrieb Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>: >=20 > On 4/1/16 12:31 AM, Martin Waschb=FCsch wrote: >> Hi all, >>=20 >> I just noticed that while just running: >>=20 >> root@dev:~# poudriere >>=20 >> lists >>=20 >> daemon -- Launch the poudriere daemon >>=20 >> among possible commands, the manpage does not mention this at all. >>=20 >> Personally, I'd consider this a bug, but am unsure how best to file a = PR for this? >>=20 >=20 > It's pretty much the same as = https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/333 >=20 > It's there for later. Thanks for the explanation. Maybe you could add that bit of information to the man page? It'd be more consistent, I think. At least to me such discrepancies are highly confusing. And judging from the conversation you linked to, I am not alone ;-) Martin=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A19AA3E8-9E94-4300-8FE1-6B69773AABDF>