From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 01:49:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B118116A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 01:49:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F86143FBF for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 01:49:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1AI3Eg-000MxI-QB for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:48:58 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:48:58 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Subject: iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:49:02 -0000 hi all, is there any interest/progress with SCSI over IP? I am asking because our NetApp is supposed to support it, and the other approach, FiberChannel/EMC seems 'slightly' expensive. thanks, danny PS: all our servers are running Freebsd 4.[8-9] with great success