From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr  5 09:32:07 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2BF3837B401; Sat,  5 Apr 2003 09:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net
	[207.217.120.46])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A832243F3F; Sat,  5 Apr 2003 09:32:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from welchsm@earthlink.net)
Received: from waldorf.psp.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.78.20])
	by grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 191rWQ-0003QN-00; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 09:32:06 -0800
Received: from [207.217.78.15] by EarthlinkWAM via HTTP;
	Sat Apr 05 09:32:06 PST 2003
Message-ID: <2935201.1049563926248.JavaMail.nobody@waldorf.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:30:49 -0600 (GMT)
From: Sean Welch <welchsm@earthlink.net>
To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Earthlink Web Access Mail version 3.0
cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject: Newer code?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Sean_Welch@alum.wofford.org
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC <freebsd-ppc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ppc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ppc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ppc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ppc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 17:32:07 -0000

I haven't played with this for a couple of weeks and I was
wondering if there had been any progress on the toolchain
effort?  I saw mention of what looked like a slightly newer
version of the gcc-diffs I was using posted here; is there
a newer version?  Anything else that could use some focussed
testing?

Is the recent work on threads causing any issues? (Just 
curious...)

                                                 Sean