From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 21:02:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EEF16A4CE; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:02:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F87043D41; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:02:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8GL276c000170; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:02:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8GL27Aj064416; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:02:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8GL27MB064415; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:02:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wb) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:02:07 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Michael Reifenberger Message-ID: <20040916210207.GA64378@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <41483C97.2030303@fer.hr> <20040916151216.GB29643@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <1095355201.530.14.camel@localhost> <20040916194526.GA3364@VARK.homeunix.com> <20040916222403.B7226@fw.reifenberger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040916222403.B7226@fw.reifenberger.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OS: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: David Schultz Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:02:09 -0000 On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:26:34PM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote.. > On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, David Schultz wrote: > ... > >Anyway, out of all the features of ZFS, support for 128-bit block > >numbers is among the least interesting, both from an engineering > >perspective and from the user's perspective. I don't know why > >everyone is so eager to discuss them. Much more interesting, for > >instance, is the pooled storage model for volume management. > >(Basically, you tell the system, ``I have a bunch of disks with > >similar QoS characteristics, and I want N filesystems on top of > >them.'' ZFS then dynamically shares the pool of storage among the > >filesystems. It's amazing how much trouble this saves.) > > > > Sounds like ADVFS on OSF/ALPHA... > Was nice to work with. Still is. AdvFS is in Tru64/TruCluster. It is the clusterfs for TruClusters. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org