From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jan  8 18:29:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id SAA18445
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 18:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id SAA18440
          for <FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 18:29:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from labs.usn.blaze.net.au (labs.usn.blaze.net.au [203.17.53.30])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id SAA14659
          for <FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 18:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (davidn@localhost)
          by labs.usn.blaze.net.au (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id NAA00807; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 13:27:30 +1100 (EST)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 13:27:30 +1100 (EST)
From: David Nugent <davidn@unique.usn.blaze.net.au>
Reply-To: davidn@blaze.net.au
To: grog@lemis.de
cc: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM>,
        FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: What's happened to nfsd and mountd?
In-Reply-To: <199701082149.WAA07770@freebie.lemis.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970109131808.775A-100000@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 8 Jan 1997 grog@lemis.de wrote:

>>>      It would also help if we knew if these people
>>>  are doing funky things with virtual interfaces or multihomed hosts. (This
>>>  information is important people! When you describe a problem, you should
>>>  go into _excrutiating_ detail. What may seem unimportant to you may speak
>>>  volumes to us.)
>>
>> Agreed.. an 'ifconfig -a' would be useful.
>
>=== root@freebie (/dev/ttyp6) /var/spool/mqueue 70 -> ifconfig -a
>lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>ep0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        inet 192.109.197.137 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.109.197.255
>        ether 00:a0:24:37:0d:2b 
>ipi0: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 192.109.197.137 --> 194.163.31.4 netmask 0xffffffc0 
>ipi1: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 192.109.197.137 --> 194.64.112.1 netmask 0xffffff00 
>ipi2: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 192..109.197.137 --> 194.163.31.129 netmask 0xffffffc0 
>ipi3: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 192.109.197.37 --> 192.109.197.38 netmask 0xffffff00 
>ipi4: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 192.109.197.148 --> 194.77.2.34 netmask 0xffffff00 
>ipi5: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 192.109.197.137 --> 194.163.31.1 netmask 0xffffffc0 
>ipi6: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 192.109.197.137 --> 192.129.52.242 netmask 0xffffff00 
>ipi7: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>ipi8: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>ipi9: flags=811<UP,POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>        inet 194.97.201.66 --> 194.97.201.9 netmask 0xffffff00 
>ipi10: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>ipi11: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>ipi12: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>ipi13: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>ipi14: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>ipi15: flags=810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX> mtu 1500
>tun0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552
>ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>ppp1: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
>        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 


We're suffering the same problem here. ifconfig -a shows:


ed0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
	inet 203.17.53.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 203.17.53.255
	ether 00:40:c7:21:ce:74 
sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552
sl1: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552
ppp0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
	inet 203.17.53.1 --> 203.17.53.17 netmask 0xfffffff0 
ppp1: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
	inet 203.17.53.1 --> 203.17.53.73 netmask 0xffffff00 
ppp2: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 552
	inet 203.17.53.1 --> 203.17.53.138 netmask 0xffffff00 
ppp3: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
	inet 203.17.53.1 --> 203.17.53.49 netmask 0xffffff00 
ppp4: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp5: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp6: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp7: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp8: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp9: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp10: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp11: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp12: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp13: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp14: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp15: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp16: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp17: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp18: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp19: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp20: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp21: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp22: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp23: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
	inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 

The first interface is up and operational. Nothing funky with IP
aliases on this box. Another one (with nothing but loopback and
ethernet) which *does* have several IP aliases on ed0 is using
the exact same build, but mountd/nfsd load and work fine there. 

Regards,
David