Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:39:38 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil+cvs-ports@tandon.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys Makefile Message-ID: <20120219203937.GA6943@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20120219191106.GA71541@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202182356.q1INuU7V061378@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org> <20120219150943.GA6673@magic.hamla.org> <20120219164528.GA48166@FreeBSD.org> <20120219175645.GA6833@magic.hamla.org> <20120219191106.GA71541@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 19:11:06 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > ... > > > Technically, since there is no supporting infrastructure to > > > ensure if some app really requires particular shlib version or > > > not (and I personally do not see how it can be implemented > > > automatically for any arbitrary port out there), the whole issue > > > right now is little more than a matter of personal preference. > > > > Emphasis on 'personal preference'. > > No sure I quite understand what do you mean. Perhaps you could > elaborate? I am not sure why you could not parse the above. You already acknowledged that the issue is "little more than a matter of personal preference." > So far it seems that my assessments are not being counterargued with > valid technical points and facts. Let me point you, once again, to the thread on freebsd-ports in which arguments have already been made against specifying library numbers in LIB_DEPENDS. For me, mi@ and dougb@'s arguments are more compelling than yours. -- Sahil Tandon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120219203937.GA6943>