Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:31:44 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: des@des.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0-BETA1: rpc.lockd broken for NFS server only configuration Message-ID: <9dd42c075d8542dc6695ce1077b96162@xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <86ll3lrdka.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <560747f4f3d58887485e1a2c0c25ac26@xcllnt.net> <86ll3lrdka.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 1, 2005, at 6:28 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >> I could of course add nfsclient to my kernel configuration file, but >> that annihilates the effort to split the server functionality from >> the client functionality, so that's no solution. > > No. A server needs both nfsserver and nfsclient, but a client needs > only nfsclient. This is a change from 5.x and 4.x, then. I never needed nfsclient on my server before. Why then do I need nfsclient now, ignoring for a moment that the nfslock pseudo-device is only present for nfsclient as that is what I think is broken? --=20 Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9dd42c075d8542dc6695ce1077b96162>