Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2025 09:04:00 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org>, "Hurling, Rainer" <rhurlin@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase Message-ID: <fee66a8b-7903-4470-8619-9b5919d4ea5d@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <BF328CA3-A975-44D3-9A60-D597E39CC8BA@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAFDf7UL6icbdu5705GFhvy3Lx5Qf4mAO9LkLp3nS=i8CMOZmBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFDf7U%2B76qtxaQZsLbS6ppg39=GofXLncnRB_MxJREe0NMuJwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFDf7U%2BGmUucAgq0y_ukRrWeJ5gW6Sb4pas55hEpyD36WLUwKw@mail.gmail.com> <68bbf05d-1d4a-4819-bb83-be6c4f002a63@gwdg.de> <CAFDf7UJ14XS7oAVjo1pcj_fqTx=PQZd3P=nQLVBkbzD0nU8X8w@mail.gmail.com> <7fb64cac-9b09-4235-9235-2bfb6c228442@gwdg.de> <CAFDf7UKT4DqT1i9aQxcM3X3bYkHVbGTxwvXxn_Lg5jNXYoOVHQ@mail.gmail.com> <4de598b1-a576-4ac6-949c-63d1065d818d@madpilot.net> <iqazj5j5pjg3kws54y3xpt72frcaslexxvzqdacsrgpt6ftemy@vvqhzxhg7oxn> <lvhulcaznwjrfnchozithatlvc5a2otkpdrlee4gvrua2qwda2@ufumkjdfzkdk> <r64nqrgxikqq6atzpzylbyfgrgrkz2bevl2tblpqjdilqkksuw@6vmkldhsi42u> <644c3cfe-6135-4e26-9043-602a10ce041a@madpilot.net> <BF328CA3-A975-44D3-9A60-D597E39CC8BA@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/02/25 09:02, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Le 1 février 2025 23:36:12 GMT+01:00, Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> a écrit : >> On 01/02/25 22:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Sat 01 Feb 22:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> On Fri 31 Jan 19:13, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>> On Fri 31 Jan 18:18, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>>>> On 27/01/25 10:56, Nuno Teixeira wrote: >>>>>>> Hello Rainer, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Wouldn't this be the right time to get Bapt@ involved? After all, he has >>>>>>> > worked intensively on the pkg updates. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes it is. I'm CC'ing bapt@. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since this issue was pestering me while testing multiple ports with >>>>>> unnecessarily lengthy rebuilds I took a look. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have posted a pull request for poudriere [1] with a fix/workaround that >>>>>> works for me and allows me to have a functional build machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure if this fix is completely correct, but maybe it can be useful >>>>>> to other people as a work around. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/pull/1204 >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> >>>>> >>>>> at quick glance it sounds like a bug in pkg I ll have a look at it next week >>>>> >>>>> Bapt >>>>> >>>> >>>> After deeper analysis, I figure pkg is right and each time it claims a need for >>>> After a deeper analysis: >>>> 32bits libs, they are actually needed. for reported ports, I think the >>>> PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes does not work yet with newer pkg version. >>>> >>>> I have found while analysing to potential bug at pkg install time for people not >>>> using pkgbase, which I will work on fixing, not nothing wrong regarding the :32 >>>> handling at pkg build time (aka what you face in poudriere). >>>> >>>> I may be wrong, but I am not sure I am. >>>> >>>> For people who haven't notice one of the major change of pkg 2.x is tracking 32 >>>> bit libraries (and potentially linux one, off for now) AND tracking base >>>> libraries always. >>>> >>>> After a deeper analysis: >>>> My understanding if poudriere with PKG_NO_VERSION_FOR_DEPS=yes would work ok as >>>> if, if the building jail was built using pkgbase. >>>> >>>> What poudriere lacks for the options if gathering base libaries to consider them >>>> as provided. >>>> >>>> Note that pkg at runtime if not running on a system install using pkgbase, will >>>> scan for base libraries. (Note this is where I found the bug I am interesting >>>> in: it does not scan for 32bit libraries yet, which make pkg check -d unhappy) >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Bapt >>>> >>> >>> And I was wrong about the pkg install bug, we do scan for 32bit livraries, so >>> everything should be fine. >> >> Bapt, thanks for the analysis. >> >> SO I gather I need to rebuild my jails from scratch, possibly from pkgbase, but I'm not sure what I can do about my head jail which I build from source, and do also use to generate pkgbase packages for my desktops/laptop etc. >> >> Or maybe I'm completely missing the point. >> > > I will look into making poudriere support this properly next week Thanks a lot for your work on all this! -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fee66a8b-7903-4470-8619-9b5919d4ea5d>