From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 14 20:28:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA08478 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:28:22 -0800 Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (root@cats-po-1.UCSC.EDU [128.114.129.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA08473 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:28:18 -0800 Received: from scruz.ucsc.edu by cats.ucsc.edu with SMTP id UAA11392; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:27:53 -0800 Received: from osprey by scruz.ucsc.edu id aa25530; 14 Nov 95 21:25 PST Received: (from markd@localhost) by Grizzly.COM (8.6.9/8.6.9) id UAA08416; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:20:45 -0800 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:20:45 -0800 From: Mark Diekhans Message-Id: <199511150420.UAA08416@Grizzly.COM> To: scott@dcs.qmw.ac.uk CC: questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199511141556.PAA26594@canary.dcs.qmw.ac.uk> (message from Scott Mitchell on Tue, 14 Nov 1995 15:56:40 +0000) Subject: Re: Tk4.0p2 on FreeBSD: compiles OK but tests fail Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >I'm currently trying to get Tk4.0 up and running on my almost-stock >.. >The trouble starts with Tk -- no complaints during the build, but _lots_ of >tests fail. Interestingly, I get less failed tests if I run them under a >pared-down X setup (just twm and an xterm) rather than my usual mess of >clients and a vastly over-configured fvwm. The output from 'make test' is >over 40K so I won't post it here -- mail me or check out my post on >comp.lang.tcl or comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc. The Tk tests are particularly sensitive to behavioral differences in window managers. I get a lot of test failures, but they don't cause any problems in reality. If you want to send me a gzipped, uuencoded version of the output, I will take a look at it and see if any thing is unusual. Mark