From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Sun Jan 29 19:22:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467A9CC7C43 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03550E91 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v77so19061774wmv.0 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:22:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aZ2+mvBcu0LUTwJYAPiT2DDjIHJa8EvHhfXj8VQ5SQc=; b=jWS2znxpD5B8ild3MwDGkfbBEo6ghJsvRTJNwwtf1SHD5wsfBKFagkhQS0AIMf+/Ib H3HqU/v3vznjtHeTYZloYc5PXTCubXNVU2AFvC8qIGK2oiXH7z22lN/J+G4E4ADo2rYo n2xQVdJBOicFJih/9NluMQywMG1oB9eZitH9U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aZ2+mvBcu0LUTwJYAPiT2DDjIHJa8EvHhfXj8VQ5SQc=; b=VzxvMLPzgGon7vUicdl6Kf7df+J6lEW/W8XjUqics/85+P+pifeXXOpBfX42aQ+jLT sVT2HwkGArepQmB4geBeRC9m0n2z1EXk5shwe1Qy+J+fHQYLsmOKhi3SBfEApePQYDT5 L+4tcT4lPd9tW4COJjGtDAgrpwntJmY7k6Ft7W7JDskSghNJh/YdJeDXKKk1IRPbxJr7 MJL8rA3voyO+K9dd6/PgMl3/CYfBcGaGcX6gCme8qWr1sySDDZdGfNAVTcZDJ5lruU7o zrELiPCwzIZFm+ho3QtoJ31tVjZzNll30+LTJqWD8/1ykuimxE9QoqA27wVq0yNCZJFY gFyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLFw3tONkO7+bvSuXQMUUUyFPBreq4HyGaL4YehjLsnzI5l/dGTjBkCocDoCqNBnPSVkdmW7n1lViw4LQ== X-Received: by 10.223.176.210 with SMTP id j18mr18222350wra.8.1485717751410; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:22:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.109.89 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:22:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:22:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: default to concurrent To: "John W. O'Brien" Cc: FreeBSD Python List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:22:33 -0000 On 29 January 2017 at 11:08, John W. O'Brien wrote: > Hello FreeBSD Python, > On the > other hand, there are lots of ports for which concurrent is a no-op, and > lots more that don't support python3 at all meaning that concurrent has > little to no chance to cause harm. > > What I propose is to enable the concurrent behavior by default and to > provide a feature to disable it when necessary. silly question but why is it an option in the first place? -- Eitan Adler