From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 1 05:34:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188CE16A41C for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 05:34:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torstenvl@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AD043D1D for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 05:34:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torstenvl@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so252877wra for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:34:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=axRR+8NeyoOAvdKZr9Lf3Ekrf9VzSNub/SRYSqiromDIpREq2+OLMIfnlfnkRkKYjY6EZutbe/gHmcLwR9k3wMuk+hmckyIjeG/566YkQqraSGPour+gIyJVemcK9GQiLHV95o0xUFTt1kcUtauAwLkKk+L+WZvN/+6rrx/wiWQ= Received: by 10.54.47.59 with SMTP id u59mr1075147wru; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.11.4 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <126eac480506302234303b0369@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:34:20 -0400 From: Josh Ockert To: Danny Pansters In-Reply-To: <126eac4805063022323f615e0e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200507010413.48881.danny@ricin.com> <126eac480506301944461b1201@mail.gmail.com> <200507010509.19049.danny@ricin.com> <126eac4805063022323f615e0e@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FYI] QT4 licensing looks very bad for *BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Josh Ockert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 05:34:22 -0000 PS - Not that I'm claiming that BSD is a total giveaway, but as long as the required notices are intact, there's nothing wrong with BSDL code being imported to GPL code.