From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 22 15:54: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F080137B400; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:53:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0MNrm913718; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 16:53:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200101222353.f0MNrm913718@harmony.village.org> To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: lastest kernel from cvs ( sh exists with signal 8 ) Cc: Mike Meyer , Kris Kennaway , "Donald J . Maddox" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, The Hermit Hacker , Peter Wemm In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:47:34 PST." References: Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 16:53:48 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message John Baldwin writes: : Nm. I was referring to the original request: : : >: >: Could you also make sure it makes it into /etc/defaults/make.conf : >: >: (KERNEL isn't mentioned there at all) and make.conf(5)? : : Which basically says: "this wasn't documented before, can you document it now?" : But anyways, this isn't really worth the effort. My laptop still isn't : booting, so I'll get back to that.... Ah. That makes sense. Technically, it was documented, but that was a very very recent change: revision 1.7 date: 2001/01/17 11:51:43; author: ben; state: Exp; lines: +19 -1 document ${KERNEL} so I agree with your sentiment as far as that goes. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message