From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 25 03:12:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA20874 for current-outgoing; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 03:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA20836 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 03:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA09697; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 03:00:41 -0700 (PDT) To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: handy@sag.space.lockheed.com, nate@mt.sri.com, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, rkw@dataplex.net, imp@village.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Sep 1996 00:36:51 PDT." <199609250736.AAA01853@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 03:00:40 -0700 Message-ID: <9695.843645640@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > No, not for version >3.5, since that was when Sun decided to merge > SunOS and SYSV. Wellll. I think "merge" is rather too strong a way of putting it (but let's try not get into an extended SunOS debate in FreeBSD-current, OK? :-) As I remember, they didn't actually start seriously perverting things into a fully SYSV direction until a fair bit later than this given that there was a lot of resistance just inside Sun to permuting the SunOS codebase thusly and what eventually became Solaris spun off fairly early, allowing SunOS to keep a fair amount of its BSDisms intact. > How about a ``which install'' here? Perchance did you get /usr/5bin/install? whjkh@wc-> which install /bin/install Jordan