From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct  1 07:44:09 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9455E1065693
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Oct 2010 07:44:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (mgw-sa02.nokia.com [147.243.1.48])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3F38FC1D
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Oct 2010 07:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com
	[172.21.30.222])
	by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id
	o917i7vw006040
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:44:07 +0300
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-112-521670312;
	protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CA51544.9080103@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:43:51 +0300
Message-Id: <750AF539-C163-428C-B930-25E08EC565FB@nokia.com>
References: <20100923.053236.231630719.hrs@allbsd.org>
	<4CA26BB7.2090907@FreeBSD.org>
	<89382820-E423-432E-8346-ADABB9FEED7F@FreeBSD.org>
	<4CA4E221.4060107@FreeBSD.org>
	<175A9E47-8457-47A6-9CA1-BDBDC407961C@FreeBSD.org>
	<4CA51544.9080103@FreeBSD.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6
	(mail.fit.nokia.com); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:43:57 +0300 (EEST)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,
	MISSING_SUBJECT,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on fit.nokia.com
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
	Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Call for testers: RFC 5569 (6rd) support in stf(4)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:44:09 -0000


--Apple-Mail-112-521670312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

On 2010-10-1, at 1:55, Doug Barton wrote:
> My point about FreeBSD 9 is that if we add the 6rd code today, then 
> release 9.0 in about a year, then support the RELENG_9 branch for 4-6 
> years that we will still be maintaining code that no one has any use 
> for. Sorry if I wasn't clear.

You're seriously underestimating the transition time needed for IPv6.

Lars
--Apple-Mail-112-521670312--