From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 21:21:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EEA16A4DE for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-java@oliverlietz.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D8243D69 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-java@oliverlietz.de) Received: from [83.129.3.59] (helo=madness.oliverlietz.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1GGj7D23eF-0004xW; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:21:24 +0200 From: Oliver Lietz To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:21:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060825231052.4dc466dc@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060825231052.4dc466dc@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608252321.21347.freebsd-java@oliverlietz.de> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:e601c222b577d6a77c17537a75592542 Cc: Norberto Meijome Subject: Re: CMS - portal server Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:21:33 -0000 Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 15:10 schrieb Norberto Meijome: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:13:18 +0300 > > Achilleas mantzios wrote: > > i am thinking of deploying a CMS system for our corporate web server. > > > > I have seen/installed/tested : > > > > Jboss Portal : Seeems good and standards complying but too unstable > > Apache Lenya : Very unstable - could not get it to any useful work > > Php-nuke : (despite our favor towards java, this seems stable but not > > what we want) OpenCMS : Very stable but not so open source - some > > one has to pay to get anything more than the basic Read the source and try to understand what's happening inside the CMS before you choose one. Some have a shiny frontend but smell inside like dead fish. [...] > Java based, I've just been reading about Magnolia, which seems quite > impressive http://www.magnolia.info , but I'm always a bit weary of > products that are open source with an 'enterprise version with more > features'... Magnolia is a good choice. It's open, has an active developer community and is standards-based. Read the "Licensing" thread from 15th August 2006 by Boris Kraft. Oliver