From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 15:10:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414EE106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F998FC18 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA5FAA7b065145 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA5FAAmh065142; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:10:10 GMT Message-Id: <201011051510.oA5FAAmh065142@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org From: "Emil Smolenski" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/151910: [zfs] booting from raidz/raidz2 on ciss(4) doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Emil Smolenski List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:10:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/151910; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Emil Smolenski" To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, am@raisa.eu.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/151910: [zfs] booting from raidz/raidz2 on ciss(4) doesn't work Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:45:39 +0100 Please see at "Originator" field in both PRs. I'm familiar with PR 148655 very well. Problem in PR 148655 is related to booting from _degraded_ raidz/raidz2/mirror. In this PR we have problem with booting from _non_degraded_ raidz/raidz2 and only when ciss(4) is used. Mirror-based configurations, SATA disks, USB sticks, other RAID controllers are all OK. Of course I tested 8.1-STABLE (from Oct) and 8.0-RELEASE (where PR 148655 is not applicable) but there were no difference -- still can't boot from raidz or raidz2. Thanks. -- am