From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:01:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4C8106564A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A46E8FC17 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A3D9CB1CA for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:01:42 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAedxru9NGaz for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:01:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257929CB229 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:01:29 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n0CK1T4u086437 for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:01:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:01:28 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090112200128.GA85280@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: [RFC]: flex/lex update X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:01:58 -0000 hi I noticed there is an update to lex/flex. The version in our tree is ancient and there seems to be some updates (http://flex.sourceforge.net/) Can someone comment on the state of lex in our tree? It's not considered a contributed software (it resides in usr.bin) but it was taken from elsewhere. what is our position? is it preferable for me to work on updating it or just fixing the one bug I ran into? thnx! roman