Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 19:31:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226931] Deprecating jail(2) and related sysctls Message-ID: <bug-226931-13-7uxNCbffwe@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226931-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-226931-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226931 --- Comment #6 from Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Bryan Drewery from comment #5) The idea will be to have "jls -j 0" to report on the current jail (if jaile= d).=20 This would allow any jail parameter to be examined (with some exclusions for security), instead of just that static list. The problem I have with the sysctls isn't the situation around reading them, but that there's a long-standing and incorrect perception that setting them affects current jails. I would keep them around read-only, but their very existence would continue that confusion. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226931-13-7uxNCbffwe>