From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 7 5:42:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.mk.bsdclub.org (motoyuki.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.205.237.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA6437B405; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:42:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from sakura.mk.bsdclub.org (sakura.mk.bsdclub.org [2001:200:341:0:2a0:c9ff:fe20:9aff]) by mail.mk.bsdclub.org (8.11.6+3.4W/3.7W/smtpfeed 1.16) with ESMTP/inet6 id g07Dfrx56456; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:41:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from sakura.mk.bsdclub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sakura.mk.bsdclub.org (8.11.6/3.7W) with ESMTP/inet id g07Dfrd08377; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:41:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200201071341.g07Dfrd08377@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> To: CHOI Junho Cc: Alexey Zelkin , Motoyuki Konno , stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: several locale renames were MFCed From: Motoyuki Konno X-Mailer: mh-e on Mule 2.3 / Emacs 19.34.1 References: <20020105183137.A79023@ark.cris.net> <200201060751.g067pJd05268@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> <20020106145658.A24730@ark.cris.net> <200201061333.g06DXmd05825@sakura.mk.bsdclub.org> <20020106154124.A32469@ark.cris.net> <86pu4nvtg2.fsf@gradius.wdb.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 22:41:53 +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, CHOI Junho wrote: > AZ> Two ways in my opinion: > > AZ> 1. link ja_JP.EUC -> ja_JP.eucJP > AZ> 2. Always create ja_JP.EUC and ja_JP.eucJP and make links > AZ> between files. Currently, many ports install files under ja_JP.EUC directory. We must move those files from ja_JP.EUC to ja_JP.eucJP manually *before* "ln -s ja_JP.eucJP ja_JP.EUC". So, I think 'plan 2' is better. > Well. For other EUC locales(ko_KR.EUC and zh_CN.EUC), similar solution > should be provided. But, who makes this links? XFree86 ports or > individual ports? I think "individual ports" is better. If XFree86 port make the link, we must update XFree86 port. Such update will affect many many FreeBSD users. P.S. Bump PORTREVISION ! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Motoyuki Konno motoyuki@bsdclub.org (Home) motoyuki@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Project) http://www.freebsd.org/~motoyuki/ (WWW) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message