Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 19:23:05 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0-STABLE? Message-ID: <38EB1409.9CCD920@newsguy.com> References: <38EA0CF6.29E817B3@home.com> <00040411163701.25816@nomad.dataplex.net> <38EAC99F.642CE420@newsguy.com> <00040500170900.10108@nomad.dataplex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Apr 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > > Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > > In the case of FreeBSD, when you change the release status ... > > Feel free to change CVS to work that way and then submit patches. > > But that IS the way CVS works. There is NO "STABLE" tag. The tag is > "RELENG_4". > > If you want CVS to reflect the way you describe the system, you would have to > change the repository to match your description. I advocate that we change > the description to match the repository. Ah, you are asking for we dropping "stable" completely, and simple refer to the (stable) branches as RELENG_3, RELENG_4, etc? Sorry, I had misunderstood you. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@zurichgnomes.bsdconspiracy.net The size of the pizza is inversely proportional to the intensity of the hunger. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38EB1409.9CCD920>