From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 18:13:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24753CA for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.shrew.net (mx2.shrew.net [38.97.5.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF038BD9 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.shrew.net (mail.shrew.prv [10.24.10.20]) by mx2.shrew.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB9HiuxI070839 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:44:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mgrooms@shrew.net) Received: from [10.16.32.30] (72-48-144-84.static.grandenetworks.net [72.48.144.84]) by mail.shrew.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B992618B3AD for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:44:45 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54873552.5000104@shrew.net> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:45:54 -0600 From: Matthew Grooms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD References: <154A442D-7814-4618-9AFC-6F9FB3F5DFD3@gmail.com> <5443A89F.8050801@digiware.nl> <981D4579-CBD4-46EF-A4E3-4236B3C06EF2@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <981D4579-CBD4-46EF-A4E3-4236B3C06EF2@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx2.shrew.net [10.24.10.11]); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:44:56 -0600 (CST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:13:34 -0000 On 12/9/2014 11:03 AM, John Nielsen wrote: > On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox >>> wrote: >>>> I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a >>>> timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? >>> >>> It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in >>> mind. >>> >>> I'll guess that it'll be towards the end of November but can be >>> accelerated if someone has a need for this in 10-STABLE sooner. >> >> I would be using such a patch as soon as it was available. On a friend's >> advice, I upgraded a ZFS server here at home with an AMD 9590 and 32Gig of >> RAM. I'd dearly like to use it to track down the netgraph bug (see my >> other recent posts), but it doesn't currently qualify. > > Ping? I'm also waiting with bated breath for this to be MFCed. :) Thanks for the great work! > +1. And on a somewhat related note, does the SVM port have equivalent to Intel Unrestricted Guest support? From what I understand, that will be required for the forthcoming UEFI/CSM ( Legacy BIOS ) as well as other bhyve features. Thanks, -Matthew