Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:20:50 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Alberto Villa <avilla@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303449 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20120902182050.GH10884@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJp7RHYFan9kVtPHdLKKowOMkCf7cXdq7HFQMD4=VZC7uxgi-g@mail.gmail.com> References: <201208312252.q7VMqj07007701@svn.freebsd.org> <20120901040818.GA37499@FreeBSD.org> <CAJp7RHb_FJB6QgjODYp02NbCubc5Gu1R0poNVi-aJzfA7wAHaQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120902171159.GB10884@FreeBSD.org> <CAJp7RHYFan9kVtPHdLKKowOMkCf7cXdq7HFQMD4=VZC7uxgi-g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:38:18PM +0200, Alberto Villa wrote: > Sounds good enough to me. I think that, as long as we manage to keep > descriptions consistent, some small variations are acceptable. I think > that a draft policy should be written, though, otherwise this whole > effort can turn into a real mess. Agreed on the policy part. As for the mess, I deliberately postponed my initial desire to fix all those badly worded entries to the point when most popular knobs will land into. I will be keeping an eye from now on to ensure that this file stays more or less perfect (with help of other caring people of course), and assuming that adding rate would be relatively low at this point, I do not think it would be particularly hard. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120902182050.GH10884>