From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 21 11:42:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E52106566B for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe07.c2i.net [212.247.154.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2356A8FC16 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:42:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=118a5bn0tGnRZbUa9ClBty6BTuM1bA5mUZqmf2RHYp4= c=1 sm=1 a=IU0TiZmyZPMA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17 a=ndaoGXS1AAAA:8 a=nFwCA7nHMiMEc0oQJVwA:9 a=bNWR_BsXDLIAWGtipBQA:7 a=rWocnR_aRTgxB9lDBEySq7cJJ5kA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117 Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 103142264; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:42:54 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:42:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20110321112141.GA23421@sh4-5.1blu.de> In-Reply-To: <20110321112141.GA23421@sh4-5.1blu.de> X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5 %V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC( :AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103211242.15230.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Webcam recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:42:56 -0000 On Monday 21 March 2011 12:21:41 Matthias Apitz wrote: > That's why I think that the man pages of webcamd are not enough, there > should be a note about if v4l or v4l2 is awaited from the application; > or we need some overall table describing the cams(...) from all webcamd > drivers and the application which can be used. Hi, I found it! CONFIG_COMPAT was not defined during build, so the webcam'd V4L2->V4L1 layer was never compiled. Can you compile the svn version of webcamd and report back? http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/video4bsd --HPS