From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 27 00:03:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F38916A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:03:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC13A43D46 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5QNvrgp036977; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:57:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 17:58:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040626.175810.127902013.imp@bsdimp.com> To: michaelnottebrock@gmx.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200406261336.26051.alex@hightemplar.com> <20040626125907.5b5b3ae7.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: alex@hightemplar.com Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:03:36 -0000 In message: <200406261535.47434.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Michael Nottebrock writes: : On Saturday 26 June 2004 12:59, Miguel Mendez wrote: : > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:36:25 +0300 : > Alex Keahan wrote: : > : > Hi, : > : > > Is Solaris/x86 supported by ibcs2 or svr4? Solaris/x86 is being : > > actively developed by Sun and is far from extinct. : > : > Solaris/x86 is a niche product. : > [...] : : That's all very subjective arguments. The question is, does the binary compat : _work_ for any recent Solaris/x86 stuff? I rather doubt it, but haven't : checked, Scott seems to suggest it doesn't. I tried with 2.7 libc and binaries from solaris. No joy. Maybe I did something wrong, but I was unsuccessful. This was in the pre 5.0-RELEASE days. Warner