Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 01:07:02 +0200 From: braukmann@tse-online.de To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of perl and tcl in vi? Message-ID: <19971008010702.47642@paert.tse-online.de> In-Reply-To: <19971008001855.ND00353@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from J Wunsch on Wed, Oct 08, 1997 at 12:18:55AM %2B0200 References: <199710071253.FAA06161@freefall.freebsd.org> <19971008001855.ND00353@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, On Wed, Oct 08, 1997 at 12:18:55AM +0200, J Wunsch wrote: > > it too, heck. Bloat that vi binary! ;-) > Nobody seems to have missed it so far. :) > (Perhaps it's only since all the Perl hackers use Emacs anyway. Does > vi do syntax highlighting these days? No? Nothing for me then... :-)) Anybody who wants to use a 'big bloated syntax highlightning perl and tcl interpreting coffee cooking' vi should really install one of that kind from the ports. I really like 'vim' for the 'quick and dirty hacks'. If `uname` results in 'emacs', then I call for 'viper'. Regards, Andreas ... back to lurking-mode ... -- /// TSE TeleService GmbH | Gsf: Arne Reuter | /// Hovestrasse 14 | Andreas Braukmann | We do it with /// D-48351 Everswinkel | HRB: 1430, AG WAF | FreeBSD/SMP /// ------------------------------------------------------------------- /// PGP-Key: http://www.tse-online.de/~ab/public-key /// Key fingerprint: 12 13 EF BC 22 DD F4 B6 3C 25 C9 06 DC D3 45 9B
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971008010702.47642>