From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 22:38:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B813216A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:38:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lnxc-641.srv.mediaways.net (smtp.compuserve.de [62.52.27.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5488443D1D for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hilko.Meyer@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 22926 invoked by uid 501); 10 Aug 2004 22:37:51 -0000 Received: from dialin-145-254-144-074.arcor-ip.net (dialin-145-254-144-074.arcor-ip.net [145.254.144.74]) by compuserve.de ([10.228.3.105]) with ESMTP via TCP; 10 Aug 2004 22:37:51 -0000 From: Hilko Meyer To: Giorgos Keramidas Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:38:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1oiih0h2ali0f4tnpo9cudv00o1h2ddl1r@smtp.compuserve.de> References: <4q0gh05ot2512gvv7hjjm6q6so4bbof3er@smtp.compuserve.de> <20040810000932.GA23836@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20040810000932.GA23836@gothmog.gr> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Handbook-appearance in Opera X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:38:01 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas schrieb: >On 2004-08-10 01:43, Hilko Meyer wrote: >> I've spotted some some problems in >> = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-nis.htm= l >> [...] >> And there is another nit. Around "NIS domainname" some tags are = missing. >> The other entries are shown bold. If I understand the sgml-code = correct, >> the following should fix that. > >The rest of the entries are shown in bold because they are "application >names". The string "NIS domainname" is not an application name so it >shouldn't be marked up as one. Ah, ok I understand this. I've mentioned that, because it is IMHO inconsistent if some entries in the table are bold and some not. >No, please. The semantics of the element should be not >abused just to get a "look and feel that we like". If the rest of the >application names look odd because of their bold font we should probably >consider removing the application tags from the rest instead. A lot of >bold words sprinkled in a seemingly random manner among running text >look worse than something that abuses the element IMHO. I don't want an argument about this. I've mentioned it while I'm here. I think either all entries should be bold or no one, but that is only my opinion. My intention was to improve the display of the tables in Opera. That is crucial, IMHO. >This is, of course, my own personal opinion and should be taken with a >grain of salt ;-) :-) tsch=FCs, Hilko