From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sat May 6 19:27:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D060D61ED4; Sat, 6 May 2017 19:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10EDA86; Sat, 6 May 2017 19:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235) id 7F4D37D71; Sat, 6 May 2017 19:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 21:27:40 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r317886 - in head: lib/libstand sys/boot/common sys/boot/i386/libi386 Message-ID: <20170506192740.5kekwxivdljccd57@ivaldir.net> References: <201705061923.v46JNwvG011568@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n6boxshr7qtk7gsy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201705061923.v46JNwvG011568@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 19:27:44 -0000 --n6boxshr7qtk7gsy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:23:58PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Author: bapt > Date: Sat May 6 19:23:58 2017 > New Revision: 317886 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/317886 >=20 > Log: > distinguish NFS versus TFTP boot by rootpath > =20 > Don't use DHCP 150 option to decide which protocol use to netboot. When > root-path includes ip address - go thru NFS, if ip address not exists in > root-path - go thru TFTP from server which ip address is in next-server= =2E But > there is one limitation - only one tftp server in network to provide lo= ader and > everything else. Does enybody use more than only one? > =20 > Submitted by: kczekirda > Sponsored by: Oktawave > MFC after: 3 weeks > Relnote: Yes > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8740 Also reviewed and approved by: tsoome and bapt Best regards, Bapt --n6boxshr7qtk7gsy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAlkOI6wACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlqYkg/+I6C/lqkFU3qWxkiMpiGYejX5z6y1ecSYeZDME+CMvuH09c1L+oOyqWGl ykboOYBNNeHle0YI/J/1/qEdFNUxuP/fm7fpiEmPEKvLChJ5DCXO5Deb1D+qkEKB gPwJhv2G7RwaINuuoyTnYCjin39zkd/d1OikY3D8DAusgu3xBsY9Qc42xaNQ9UjH R90+w0a+OhkVLt4yX1xZbt9NQoOoqy92yl5kFojZ7f5p22xTaYbjcR+nZpUAnscf yqwpGMM69nF0iaix2LWiM2of44+ZnjmkxMFrPJ+Z8wDIKWZPLudsBThR1kNs4g3b epEBOADmsOZ33lcwMcdelR7ul9TPAAwEljdXi8WYDESrn+Z6Ukm+zu6AEUGGej/2 cy+WffYvkwP3pT5rW85LzX0hVXMaorzQjugkoCTs3AGvW+aWOQFGV0VCDHPBQKw5 l0Tl/V33ZUhqbhYqWBttkGuZmKcKT7LJrlfUuNd5bkk68H1UyYFUBYHfWHvKaXlD jkdsOAQABL/jm/r5nmTwsQ577KySusILcVZ9uH/aPo7pGAtDB+NkxCTsQCu3MlU1 /MAwAJfjYZXA+ZASMLVUfD7KDWj5sIx8CxeKpugvjHMWqG6pChbNQPqnjWKrUPkS BZSAJuBKDQLfx0B2A0UbwgEhxOsD3OW/PS7cUf1ZKqa5WuOKmdI= =9w8X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n6boxshr7qtk7gsy--