Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 01:12:52 -0800 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) To: phk@ref.tfs.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ghostscript fails Message-ID: <199503290912.BAA02790@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199503290207.SAA06132@ref.tfs.com> (message from Poul-Henning Kamp on Tue, 28 Mar 1995 18:07:30 -0800 (PST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* 1 out of 6 hunks failed... Not picking on you specifically Poul, but can people at least cut & paste the error messages when reporting something? That might save a lot of time and unnecessary mail messages going back and forth. And for your ghostscript problem, ======= asami(p0) thud 11 00:26:50 /f/work/asami/ghostscript >> make patch Checksums OK. ===> Extracting for ghostscript-2.6.1 ===> Applying distributed patches for ghostscript-2.6.1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ghostscript-2.6.1 ======= My guess is that you need the new bsd.port.mk that I committed yesterday, as the application of "official" patches are now handled by bsd.port.mk, not the ports Makefile. Just FYI, I removed the PATCHFILES variable from the Makefile, and voila: ======= asami(p0) thud 13 01:08:40 /f/work/asami/ghostscript >> make patch ===> Cleaning for ghostscript-2.6.1 Checksums OK. ===> Extracting for ghostscript-2.6.1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ghostscript-2.6.1 1 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to gdevtiff.c.rej *** Error code 1 Stop. ======= If this is what you're seeing, you just need the new bsd.port.mk. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503290912.BAA02790>