From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Sep  3  8:53:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D3B6C37B405; Mon,  3 Sep 2001 08:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B473210F42C; Mon,  3 Sep 2001 10:53:51 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 10:53:51 -0500
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile pkg-plist
Message-ID: <20010903105351.A56566@leviathan.inethouston.net>
Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Mail-Followup-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
References: <200109030549.f835nDa75558@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010903110628.G72833@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010903110628.G72833@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:06:28AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:49:13PM -0700, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > dwcjr       2001/09/02 22:49:13 PDT
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     mail/mutt-devel      Makefile pkg-plist 
> >   Log:
> >   Update PORTDOC compliance
> >   
> >   Submitted by:	maintainer
> 
> Aside from the use of %%PORTDOCS%% mentioned by others, I think that
> both this and rev. 1.126 should have bumped PORTREVISION.
> 
> IIRC, the rule for bumping PORTREVISION is that any change which
> modifies the package should be indicated as such.  The previous
> commit would have modified a package built with a different LOCALBASE,
> and this commit would have modified a package built with NOPORTDOCS
> (e.g. a custom release build).
> 
> Or am I going too far? :)
> 
I would have, but I already bumped portrevision that day so I didn't 
think that I needed to in the same day.

-- 
David W. Chapman Jr.
dwcjr@inethouston.net	Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net>
dwcjr@freebsd.org	FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message