From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 26 18:16:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AB816A4CE; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF3D43D53; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3R1GDJL026118; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:16:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i3R1GD4u071504; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:16:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i3R1GD6a071503; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:16:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:16:13 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Alexey Dokuchaev Message-ID: <20040427011613.GC71345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200404262312.i3QNCGUp041625@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040427003254.GA71345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040427010227.GA66916@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040427010227.GA66916@regency.nsu.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Ade Lovett cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/automake14 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:16:14 -0000 On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:02:28AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 05:32:54PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > I never saw any email from you on the topic, BTW. I guess it was > > flagged as spam (assuming you actually did send me an email) and > > sent to /dev/null. > > That's why is generally better to flush spam somewhere from where it can > be read, shall you need it, and occasionally just rm it. 8-) This really is conditional upon what it is better for. It certainly is not better for my disposition, so in my case it's not a good way to deal with spam :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net