From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 23 11:24:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA19979 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA19974 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA01010; Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:11:55 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199706231811.LAA01010@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: OpenBSD To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 11:11:55 -0700 (MST) Cc: spork@super-g.com, black@zen.cypher.net, mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Warner Losh" at Jun 23, 97 08:26:24 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > : > > Of course, the "20 or more security fixes", w/o mentioning subsystems was > I have at least 50 in my tree here from OpenBSD and about 150 more on > deck to check out when I get the time and energy again. The "checkout" > ones are running about 50% in FreeBSD, 40% should be in FreeBSD, 9% > OpenBSD specific for some reason, and 1% bad fixes. Have you clarified for them the "bad fixes"? I would hate for FreeBSD to do the same thing that Lynne Jolitz did regarding the patchkit patches: state that there were bad fixes, and then refuse to identify them so that they could be defended (or repaired). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.