Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 04:41:15 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Cc: Dak Ghatikachalam <dghatikachalam@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Murray Taylor <MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au> Subject: Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term) Message-ID: <20070121024114.GA2767@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20070119152124.GE25249@submonkey.net> References: <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F1267327@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal> <20070118231254.GA5405@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20070119152124.GE25249@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-01-19 15:21, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote: >On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 09:42:54AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I think the biggest problem with Microsoft MUAs is not where they >> position the cursor, but the difficulty they cause in editing the >> text. My editor also positions the cursor at the very top when I >> reply to a message. But it also makes it possible to tidy things >> up. > > To be fair to Microsoft (or perhaps this makes it even worse), their > Mac development team clearly understand this, as Entourage (the Mac > equivalent of Outlook) doesn't do any of the tens of stupid things > that Outlook does. Quite right. I have been talking with some colleagues recently about some of the things that *even* Entourage fails to do (i.e. wrapping of text and quoted material), but it is definitely a huge improvement over Outlook :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070121024114.GA2767>