From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 7 13:13:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from george.he.net (george.he.net [216.218.157.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CC337B407 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 13:13:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from adsl-63-193-247-201.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-63-193-247-201.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.247.201]) by george.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id NAA07028; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 13:13:08 -0700 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 12:20:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Schoolcraft X-Sender: bill@corten2.billschoolcraft.com To: Josef Grosch Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "No tun0 ?" In-Reply-To: <20010707111532.A63756@mooseriver.com> Message-ID: System-ID: [en] (I; Linux i86pc) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Sat, 7 Jul 2001 it looks like Josef Grosch composed: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 10:16:28AM -0700, Bill Schoolcraft wrote: > > Hello Family, > > > > In trying to replace my Linux NATD/DNS perimeter box I've followed > > the firewall howto at the BSD Vault site, recompiled the kernel > > "word for word" by the instructions and I of couse expected some > > errors but the one that dmesg says is the one I'm concerned with > > now, it's no tun0 > > > > I'm running FreeBSD-4.2 loaded off the released CD > > > Do you have the following line in your kernel config file ? > > pseudo-device tun > > If you do you should have tun0. If not add that line to the config file and > recompile the kernel. It should already be there. Try going into the /dev > directory and try the following > > cd /dev > ./MAKEDEV tun0 > > That should do it. > Thanks Joe, Yes all the above are located but I'm having some other issues that have never happened with FreeBSD. I can ping all my nameservers by IP, have the same stanza's in /etc/resolv.conf as I've used for years, but the new 4.2 box refuses to resolv by name. If I add the IP/name in /etc/hosts then of course I can ping by name. I went into /etc/host.conf and commented out the [host] line and then cannot ping anything. Does the new IPFW options in the kernel blow away something that used to work by default ? Thanks -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 -o) San Francisco CA 94121 /\ "UNIX, A Way Of Life." _\_v http://forwardslashunix.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message