From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 10 17:38:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB9E16A418 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2CF13C43E for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id m1AHcNEr004360; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:38:24 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:38:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:38:24 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <76888.1202655761@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: References: <76888.1202655761@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fifolog - a circular file for embedded systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:38:26 -0000 On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > On NanoBSD and similar systems running on flash devices, logfiles > are a problem due to the write-wear on the flash devices. [ ... ] > The complete fifolog tools sources: > > http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/fifolog.tgz > > The manual page is included below. > > Comments, code reviews and opinions on the suitability of this for > inclusion in FreeBSDs base system are most welcome. I think this would be a great addition, if nothing else than to be available for NanoBSD. -- DE